Stan Abrams writes:
You probably think this is a pretty easy case. This “Haager-Dasz” trademark was obviously filed in bad faith, and this local company should not be allowed to use it. This is yet another one of those trademark squatting situations, right?Yes, but that doesn’t mean that the case is, as we say back home, “open and shut.”
Read more: http://www.chinahearsay.com/beijing-judge-gives-haager-dasz-trademark-thumbs-down/
China’s July Exports Beat Expectations, Up 14.5%
DealShot: 20 Deals Reaching $150 Million Including Dayone Capital, Qiming And Many More
Fonterra apologises to Chinese consumers
Australia to beef up armed forces
Federal Reserve closely monitoring impact of trade disputesThe digital divide over consumer data widens
China’s winning streak driven by investors taking long view
Apple to shift some iPad production to Vietnam amid China supply chain woesEurasia Group Publishes Top Risks for 2021China embraces ‘steel camels’ to transport goods to Europe